Oriol - Le nouveau vaisseau russe
Page 12 sur 29
Page 12 sur 29 • 1 ... 7 ... 11, 12, 13 ... 20 ... 29
Le PTS est conçu AUSSI avec les avis des cosmonautes. Par exemple sur la nécessité ou non d'un comportiment orbital lors des voyages courts vers l'ISS ou bien encore sur le volume habitable... La prochaine étape de modernisation du soyouz (Soyouz MS) fera partie de cette conception puisque nombre des dispositifs intégreront directement le PTS.
http://novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/news/2551/26.11.2012 In the first flight of the new Russian spacecraft lead experienced astronauts
Experienced astronauts can be brought to flight test advanced transport complex of new generation (PTC NP), "Interfax-AVN" Chief Cosmonaut Training Center (CTC) cosmonaut Sergei Krikalev.
"Most likely, it will be experienced astronauts who will be involved in this work," - he said.
According S.Krikaleva, training astronauts to work with the new spacecraft will begin when the "more or less outline his path." Before creating a new ship, he said, is scheduled for the next stage of modernization "Soyuz" (project "Union MS"), which will be tested a number of systems, which then find their application in PTK NP.
"When the new ship will do, I think a lot has been done in the framework of" Soyuz-MS ", will be transferred there," - said the head of the CPC.
He also said that the developers conceptual design PTK NP, turned to astronauts listened to their suggestions to the ship. For example, the astronauts were in favor of greater than this "Union" habitable volume of the new ship, the ability to control them with one or two crew members.
"They discussed the question, should there be a habitation module or not. My point was that with short orbital flights habitation module is not very necessary. This version won" - said S.Krikalev.
On the other hand, the desire to increase the accuracy of the landing ship, was not accepted. "The discussion was attended by the then astronauts different groups of astronauts - CPC and RSC" Energia ". Something of our proposal is accepted, something is taken. Requirements ship assembled from many sources," - he said.
patchfree a écrit:. La prochaine étape de modernisation du soyouz (Soyouz MS) fera partie de cette conception puisque nombre des dispositifs intégreront directement le PTS.
Donc il vont encore faire évoluer la capsule Soyouz en une nouvelle version Soyouz MS ?
Elle a encore de beaux jours devant elle .... pour ce qui est des vols en LEO.
montmein69- Donateur
- Messages : 20962
Inscrit le : 01/10/2005
Age : 73
Localisation : région lyonnaise
montmein69 a écrit:patchfree a écrit:. La prochaine étape de modernisation du soyouz (Soyouz MS) fera partie de cette conception puisque nombre des dispositifs intégreront directement le PTS.
Donc il vont encore faire évoluer la capsule Soyouz en une nouvelle version Soyouz MS ?
Elle a encore de beaux jours devant elle .... pour ce qui est des vols en LEO.
Oui encore une évolution. Mais peu apparente de toute façon. Ce sont les composants internes qui sont modernisés, changés, simplifiés, digitalisés, etc...Pour le MS il s'agissait de l'introduction du GPS/Glonass dans la gestion de la trajectoire du soyouz, modification qui selon le post ci-dessous de Nikolaï n'attendra pas cette version MS mais sera implantée sur de prochains TMA-M.
Et il y a un fil déjà ici sur le soyouz-MS: http://www.forum-conquete-spatiale.fr/t12856-nouvelle-version-du-soyouz-soyouz-ms?highlight=soyouz+-MS
Dernière édition par patchfree le Jeu 29 Nov 2012 - 14:31, édité 1 fois
patchfree a écrit:Pour le MS il s'agit de l'introduction du GPS/Glonass dans la gestion de la trajectoire du soyouz.
Non, cette modif sera bientôt intégrée sur les Soyouz TMA-M, et elle n'attendra pas les Soyouz-MS.
_________________
Kosmonavtika - Le site de l'Espace russe
Des nouvelles fraîches du PTS dans une interview de Brioukhanov (l'ingénieur en chef du PTS). Le projet a dû être profondément changé quand on est passé d'un vaisseau pour l'orbite terrestre à un vaisseau pour aller jusqu'à l'orbite lunaire. Cela a entraîné de nombreuses modifications, même si exterieurement l'aspect reste le même. Pour voler vers la lune le PTS pourra emporter 4 cosmonautes. Autour de la terre, 6. Bouclier thermique, module de propulsion (8 tonnes de carburant), système de communication radio ont dû être repensés. Maintenant la phase qui commence est la plus chère financièrement. Mais le budget suivra-t-il?
"News", dated January 21, 2013. We were forced to reconsider the entire project mission to the moon
Chief designer of manned systems RSC "Energia" Nicholas Bryukhanov - creating a new interplanetary spacecraft
Nicholas Albertovich Bryukhanov
February 1 Scientific and Technical Council of the Federal Space Agency
plans to review the draft of manned spacecraft, which in the long term,
in 7-8 years, will replace the current "union."
The fate of the ship of the new generation are not simple: the finished
sketch plan had to finish with the increased demands - from transport
to fly into Earth orbit had to create a spaceship that can carry
astronauts to the moon.
That was the result, the correspondent of "Izvestia" said chief
designer of manned systems Rocket and Space Corporation (RSC) "Energy"
Nicholas Bryukhanov.
-
Nicholas Albertovich what additions had to be made in the project due
to the fact that last year, it was decided to prepare a manned
expedition to the moon?
- Change in the terms of reference was in April last year.
It was at first small, but in fact turned over all the things that
we've done in the job of the ship, which was developed by us in 2010. First, change the speed of entry into the atmosphere: the return to the Moon is the second ship of the comic speed.
In the previous configuration - for the orbiter - the calculations were
made for a velocity of 8 km / s, and now we need to count on the 11 km /
s.
Huge difference: it turns out that the machine will have two times more
kinetic energy than the one that comes back to Earth orbit. All of this energy is converted into heat. Quite another to be heat shield.
Therefore, all the efforts we spent primarily on the development of
thermal protection in the development of the former conceptual design
were insufficient.
The problem is, that after the closure of the "Buran", that is, for
more than 20 years, we have research in the field of thermal insulation
has been conducted, no progress in this direction was not. We had to do in a short time to spend research and development, way, which many countries are decades. We had a job, getting positive results during experiments in wind tunnels and on the plasma torches. Now we have to get a confirmation of our decisions at a higher level.
In second place is worth of ballistics - is a Herculean task in relation to the moon. Our country is far from the equator and from the point of view of removal of payloads is not profitable. More unfortunate our geography in terms of return from the moon.
To return the machine to get to the Russian landfills landing big
enough energy needed for small and rarely get "windows" for the start of
the orbit of the moon.
- Where in Russia are planned landfill landing?
- Landfills are intended to land in southern Russia.
Return to the Moon's orbit is via the South Pole and the equator the
higher the need to put the ship, the more difficult this task.
Superimposed and time limit - by changing the position of the moon
relative to the Earth "window" to return to the moon are rather rare.
But at the same time you need to provide all kinds of emergency
situations: for example, if you have to return the crew to Earth for
health reasons. You must be able to do it at any time. And if we have the rare 'window' return, the security, however. Therefore, in any given propulsion system must be able to give impetus enough to return to Earth.
But if the ships, flying in low Earth orbit, the necessary impetus to
hundreds of meters per second, for a lunar vehicle is much greater
magnitude.
Our goal - to be able to give impetus to the ship propulsion at 1.5 km / sec. It was hard, but we have proposed a scheme of flight, which can solve the problem of an emergency return to Earth. Ship's engine room has increased slightly in volume, so there we have to be about 8 tons of fuel.
And the rest remain the same concept: a reusable reentry vehicle,
landing on the shock absorbers that is, without tumbling, characteristic
of the "Union."
- The appearance of the ship, too, had to be revised?
- No, the appearance has not changed much.
Maybe it would cost to change, but the fact is that at the stage of
technical proposals and conceptual design, we spent a lot of research
and experimental work, did a lot of aerodynamic purging, which involved
three: TsAGI TSNIIMASH, Novosibirsk Branch of RAS . Amount of money was spent on it, and a huge amount of work performed. And if we now change the appearance, then we would have to do it all over again to do. And it's not only money but also time. In vain would have been the work we have done for almost four years. Therefore, we decided to leave the re-entry vehicle in the same form in which it was. Inside there is a change, the meaning of which is that instead of six seats in the vehicle is four. If necessary, you can put two chairs and return to Earth to six people.
- Whether to take into account the priority areas on the moon in terms of scientific research?
- The terms of reference there is a certain ambiguity: it is necessary to fly to the moon. And what it means to fly to the moon? Which orbit around the moon? A polar or equatorial? There is no particular problem. We took the most difficult to solve - polar orbit. Because if we go into a polar orbit, in future be able to sit anywhere in the Moon. If we are flying back to the equatorial orbit, we can only sit at the equator. In addition, the polar regions of the moon are of most interest to scientists. Therefore, we took the most universal path that provides the solution of various problems.
- The projected ship equipment has changed significantly?
- A number of nuances changed: Radio should be different, as long range.
Life support system must also be based on other principles, because it
is one thing when the astronauts fly to the space station and it takes
up two days. It's quite another when you plan to fly to the moon.
System reliability should be higher, because the same ISS we are always
almost go back, and the flight from the moon takes three and a half
days. Also, there are questions about the temperature control system, power supply and other areas. In fact, we had to review the entire project, remodel almost everything that was done in 2011 and early 2012. How we did it - prompt, but, in my opinion, failed.
- When ideally you can come up with a new ship to the stage of flight tests?
- It's hard to say. Scheme adopted today includes work on projects stages. Upon completion of each competition is announced a new phase. Rhythm of the process and the amount of funding depends terms.
Now comes the most expensive stage: as soon as the design documentation
is released, we'll have to do research facilities, including pilot
boats - for airborne discharges, to start up on rockets for testing
systems bailout and so on. This is the most expensive stage in the making. And if money will flow thin stream, that is, the creation process can drag on for decades. But if we do not want to lag behind the other space powers, we need to make the ship to fly unmanned at least 2018.
Juste pour l'archivage, j'enregistre ici la version originale de l'interview.
- Spoiler:
- 1 февраля научно-технический совет Федерального космического агентства планирует рассмотреть проект пилотируемого космического корабля, который в перспективе, через 7–8 лет, должен заменить нынешние «Союзы». Судьба корабля нового поколения складывается непросто: уже готовый эскизный проект пришлось доделывать с учетом возросших требований — из транспорта для полетов на околоземную орбиту потребовалось создать межпланетный корабль, способный доставить космонавтов к Луне. О том, что получилось в результате, корреспонденту «Известий» рассказал главный конструктор пилотируемых комплексов Ракетно-космической корпорации (РКК) «Энергия» Николай Брюханов.
— Николай Альбертович, какие дополнения пришлось внести в проект в связи с тем, что в прошлом году было принято решение готовить пилотируемую экспедицию к Луне?
— Изменение технического задания произошло в апреле прошлого года. Оно было на первый взгляд незначительным, но по сути перевернувшим все то, что мы сделали в рамках работ по тому кораблю, который разрабатывался нами с 2010 года. Во-первых, изменилась скорость входа в атмосферу: при возвращении от Луны корабль имеет вторую комическую скорость. В прежней конфигурации — для орбитального корабля — расчеты производились для скорости порядка 8 км/с, а теперь нужно рассчитывать на 11 км/с.
Разница гигантская: получается, что аппарат будет обладать в два раза большей кинетической энергией, чем тот, что возвращается с околоземной орбиты. Вся эта энергия переходит в тепло. Совершенно другой должна быть теплозащита. Поэтому все усилия, которые мы затратили прежде на разработку теплозащиты при разработке прежнего эскизного проекта, оказались недостаточными. Сложность в том, что после закрытия проекта «Буран», то есть в течение 20 с лишним лет, у нас исследовательских работ в области теплозащиты не проводилось, никакого продвижения в этом направлении не было. Мы вынуждены были в короткое время сами провести научно-исследовательские работы, пройдя путь, который многие страны проходят десятилетиями. Мы такую работу провели, получив положительные результаты в процессе экспериментов в аэродинамических трубах и на плазмотронах. Сейчас нам предстоит получить подтверждение наших решений на более высоком уровне.
На втором месте по сложности стоит баллистика — это сложнейшая применительно к Луне задача. Наша страна далека от экватора и с точки зрения выведения полезных нагрузок расположена невыгодно. Еще более неудачна наша география с точки зрения возврата с Луны. Чтобы возвращаемый аппарат мог попасть на российские полигоны посадки, нужны достаточно большие энергозатраты при маленьких и редко выпадающих «окнах» для старта с орбиты Луны.
— Где на территории России планируются полигоны посадки?
— Полигоны посадки планируются в южной части РФ. Возврат с орбиты Луны осуществляется через Южный полюс и чем выше от экватора нужно сажать корабль, тем сложнее решить эту задачу. Накладываются и временные ограничения — в силу изменения положения Луны относительно Земли «окна» для возвращения с Луны получаются довольно редкими. Но в то же время нужно предусматривать разного рода нештатные ситуации: например, если придется вернуть экипаж на Землю по состоянию здоровья. Нужно уметь это делать в любой момент времени. А если у нас редкие «окна» возврата, то о безопасности говорить не приходится. Поэтому в любой момент двигательная установка должна быть способна выдать импульс, достаточный для возврата к Земле. Но если для кораблей, летающих на околоземной орбите, необходимый импульс исчисляется сотнями метров в секунду, то для лунного корабля это гораздо большие величины.
Наша цель — уметь выдать двигательной установкой корабля импульс на уровне 1,5 км/сек. Было тяжело, но мы предложили такую схему полета, которая позволяет решить задачу экстренного возвращения на Землю. Двигательный отсек корабля немного вырос в объеме, так как там мы вынуждены иметь около 8 т топлива. А в остальном оставили прежнюю концепцию: многоразовое использование возвращаемого аппарата, посадка на амортизирующие опоры, то есть без кувырканий, характерных для «Союза».
— Внешний облик корабля тоже пришлось пересматривать?
— Нет, внешний облик не сильно изменился. Может быть, его бы и стоило изменить, но дело в том, что на этапах технических предложений и эскизного проекта мы очень много провели НИР и экспериментальных работ, сделали много аэродинамических продувок, в которых были задействованы три организации: ЦАГИ, ЦНИИМАШ, Новосибирское отделение РАН. Масса денег была на это затрачена, и объем работ проведен колоссальный. И если бы мы сейчас изменили внешний облик, то нам бы пришлось вообще все заново делать. А это не только деньги, но еще и время. Напрасной оказалась бы работа, которую мы делали почти четыре года. Поэтому мы приняли решение оставить возвращаемый аппарат в той же форме, в которой он был. Внутри есть изменения, смысл которых в том, что вместо шести мест в корабле остается четыре. При необходимости можно поставить еще два кресла и вернуть на Землю до шести человек.
— Принимались ли в расчет приоритетные места на Луне с точки зрения научных исследований?
— В техзадании есть некая многозначность: нужно летать к Луне. А что значит летать к Луне? На какую орбиту вокруг Луны? На полярную или экваториальную? Конкретной задачи нет. Мы взяли наиболее сложно решаемую — полярную орбиту. Потому что если мы выйдем на полярную орбиту, то в перспективе сможем сесть в любую точку Луны. Если же мы прилетим на экваториальную орбиту, то сможем сесть только на экваторе. Кроме того, полярные области Луны вызывают наибольший интерес у ученых. Поэтому мы брали наиболее универсальную траекторию, обеспечивающую решение различных задач.
— Проектируемое оборудование корабля изменилось значительно?
— Ряд нюансов поменялся: радиосистемы должны быть другими, так как большая дальность. Система жизнеобеспечения тоже должна строиться на других принципах, потому что одно дело, когда космонавты летят к орбитальной станции и это занимает максимум двое суток. И совсем другое, когда планируется полет к Луне. Надежность систем должна быть выше, потому что с той же МКС мы в любой момент практически можем вернуться, а полет от Луны занимает трое с половиной суток. Также появились вопросы по системе терморегулирования, электропитания и другим направлениям. Фактически нам пришлось весь проект пересматривать, переделывать практически все, что было сделано в 2011-м и начале 2012 года. Насколько нам это удалось — подскажут, но, на мой взгляд, удалось.
— Когда в идеале вы можете выйти с новым кораблем на стадию летных испытаний?
— Трудно сказать. Принятая сегодня схема работ над проектами предусматривает этапы. По завершении каждого объявляется конкурс на новый этап. От ритмичности этого процесса и от объемов финансирования зависят сроки. Сейчас наступает самый затратный этап: как только будет выпущена конструкторская документация, мы должны будем делать экспериментальные установки, в том числе экспериментальные корабли — для самолетных сбросов, для пусков на ракетах, для отработки систем экстренного спасения и так далее. Это самый дорогой этап в создании. И если деньги будут поступать тоненьким ручейком, что бывает, то процесс создания может растянуться на десятилетия. Но если мы не хотим плестись в хвосте у других космических держав, нам необходимо сделать корабль для полетов в беспилотном варианте хотя бы к 2018 году.
Читайте далее: http://izvestia.ru/news/543178#ixzz2IjaGVSvP
_________________
Kosmonavtika - Le site de l'Espace russe
Le PTS commence a pointer son nez... Energia a tenu son NTS soit son Conseil Scientifique et Technique qui avait pour but de présenter le design technique du vaisseau spatial.
Présentation technique mais présentation au plein sens du terme puisque les technologies retenues étaient présentes sous forme de matériaux exposés sur des tables dans l'amphitéâtre où se tenait la réunion.
Le CST a en conséquence entérinné le design technique jugé répondre aux demandes du client qui n'est autre que Roscosmos. Ce design technique va maintenant être remis à Roscosmos, ou plus précisément au "ЦНИИ машиностроения" (Central Research Institute of Machine Building) pour qu'il soit examiné.
C'est une étape importante pour le PTS, même s'il reste à Roscosmos et au gouvernement russe de prendre la décision de financer son développement.
Le point qui est le plus crucial est son lanceur qui n'est ni désigné, ni donc conçu. Ce pourrait être un dérivé de l'Angara dont le nom de code serait "Amour", ce qui est assez logique puisque le cosmodrome depuis lequel il sera lancé sera "Vostochny" dans la région Amour...
http://www.energia.ru/ru/news/news-2013/news_02-01_1.html
Chief designer of the manned space complexes NA Bryukhanov
Au bout de la file qui observe les matériaux, Marc Serov le mari de la cosmonaute E Serova.
Présentation technique mais présentation au plein sens du terme puisque les technologies retenues étaient présentes sous forme de matériaux exposés sur des tables dans l'amphitéâtre où se tenait la réunion.
Le CST a en conséquence entérinné le design technique jugé répondre aux demandes du client qui n'est autre que Roscosmos. Ce design technique va maintenant être remis à Roscosmos, ou plus précisément au "ЦНИИ машиностроения" (Central Research Institute of Machine Building) pour qu'il soit examiné.
C'est une étape importante pour le PTS, même s'il reste à Roscosmos et au gouvernement russe de prendre la décision de financer son développement.
Le point qui est le plus crucial est son lanceur qui n'est ni désigné, ni donc conçu. Ce pourrait être un dérivé de l'Angara dont le nom de code serait "Amour", ce qui est assez logique puisque le cosmodrome depuis lequel il sera lancé sera "Vostochny" dans la région Amour...
"The face of the new ship is accepted, but the ship itself, without a number of projects. Remaining parts of the technical design (prospective manned transportation system) yet is not possible, since it is not defined, what will be the launch vehicle," - said Lopota.
According to him, a booster with a working title of "Cupid" for forward-looking transport system planned to be based missiles "Angara". "But at the moment the new missile" Cupid "no, its performance either. Therefore, the remaining part of the Technical Proposal (prospective transport system) can not yet realize. Wait missile" - said Lopota
02/01/2013.
Scientific and Technical Council RSC "Energia": materials engineering design prospective manned transportation system meets the requirements of the Customer
Rocket and Space Corporation "Energia" after SP Queen of the meeting of the Scientific and Technical Council (STC) of the Corporation, which reviewed the main results of the first phase of the technical design perspective manned transport system, made by the Corporation in accordance c technical requirements of the Federal Space Agency (Roskosmos).
Meeting was chaired by the chairman of the NTS, First Deputy General Designer of RSC "Energia" Academician VP Legostaev.
The work of the Council was attended by President of the Corporation, General Designer VA Lopota, representatives of the Russian Space Agency, Central Research Institute of Machine Building, managers, scientists and corporations, businesses and organizations participating in the project development.
Participants of the meeting heard a statement by the President of the Corporation, General Designer VA Lopota and reports of the First Deputy General Designer, chief designer of the manned space complexes NA Bryukhanova, chief technologist for Machine Building Plant RSC "Energia" SY Shachneff, Deputy General Designer AG Derechina.
Speakers presented the main technical and innovative solutions for manned spacecraft, launch vehicles, tools, inter-orbital transfer, the ascent unit, as well as technology of manned transport spacecraft (TAP).
Were presented shape manned space complex (PAC), the general timetable for the creation, development and results of the technical and economic performance of the technical project. Were also provided data on the experimental testing, availability of production base to manufacture and ship the competitiveness of the project.
NTS, noting that the materials meet the requirements of the technical design specification of the customer, recommended to send the materials to the examination in the parent institution of the Customer - Central Research Institute of Machine Building.
http://www.energia.ru/ru/news/news-2013/news_02-01_1.html
Chief designer of the manned space complexes NA Bryukhanov
Au bout de la file qui observe les matériaux, Marc Serov le mari de la cosmonaute E Serova.
Le lanceur Amour aura 3 cores ou 5 cores ?
Ou bien y aura t'il à la fois un Amour-3 pour l'orbite terrestre et un Amour-5 pour des missions lunaires ?
Il reste pas mal de choses encore à préciser .....
Ou bien y aura t'il à la fois un Amour-3 pour l'orbite terrestre et un Amour-5 pour des missions lunaires ?
Il reste pas mal de choses encore à préciser .....
montmein69- Donateur
- Messages : 20962
Inscrit le : 01/10/2005
Age : 73
Localisation : région lyonnaise
montmein69 a écrit:Le lanceur Amour aura 3 cores ou 5 cores ?
Ou bien y aura t'il à la fois un Amour-3 pour l'orbite terrestre et un Amour-5 pour des missions lunaires ?
Il reste pas mal de choses encore à préciser .....
J'espère qu'avec un tel nom, il n'y aura pas d'applications militaires ...Bon d'accord l'amour en russe ce traduit par : любить [ lyubitʹ ]
Giwa- Donateur
- Messages : 12848
Inscrit le : 15/04/2006
Age : 81
Localisation : Draguignan
Lopota qui se plaint qu'on ne choisisse pas pour lancer le PTS un dérivé de la Zenit qui serait pourtant une solution économique et moderne comparée à un dérivé de l'Angara qui n'a pas même volé et donc aucune fiabilité.
13/02/2013
At the same time Lopota noted that developed in Russia for long-term transport vehicle (PTC) has no booster. CEO said that in late January, the ship was considered a project on scientific and technical council of "energy." "At present, the project was transferred to the Federal Space Agency. His review should take place within the month. Federal Space Agency requested in turn to organize it by the TsNIIMASH ", - he said.
"However, the launch vehicle for this ship yet - continued Lopota. - The terms of reference for the project to remove the ship provides booster "Cupid" to be set up on the basis of one of the variants of PH "Angara", which is not, and its the first option - rocket light class - created about 20 years of age " .
"Last year, we proposed a cost-effective and energy-booster super-heavy, evolutionary developing rocket technology," Energy ", which has flight qualified and saved thanks to the" Sea Launch ", - informed the general designer. - But while more than talk is not gone. "
Replying to a question, to which he will create PTC, president of the corporation said that with adequate funding RSC "Energia" will do everything to the ship was ready in 2017.
Lopota also said that to begin flight testing of PTC in the automatic mode in 2017 is possible with the use of a carrier rocket "Zenith", as it demonstrates sufficient reliability and "other boosters to solve this problem in the near future is not expected."
Pourquoi le ministère russe de la Défense critique le projet du futur vaisseau PTS ? :scratch:
La traduction Google me donne la nausée. :wall:
http://lenta.ru/news/2013/02/20/fail/
http://izvestia.ru/news/545287
La traduction Google me donne la nausée. :wall:
http://lenta.ru/news/2013/02/20/fail/
http://izvestia.ru/news/545287
Anubis- Messages : 965
Inscrit le : 02/08/2007
Age : 37
Localisation : canada
Traduction de l'article 1 vers l'anglais par Bing :
Et l'article 2 toujours par Bing (il dit à peu près la même chose)
On retrouve l'argument des limites pour mettre au point une capsule tant que le lanceur dédié n'existe pas (Angara 3 ou 5 cores ? ou bien encore autre chose sous le vocable Amour ?) et que le complexe de tir doit aussi être conçu en conséquence (du vol habité).
Ces remarques -pour ne pas dire récriminations- contre les incohérences ont-elles une certaine cohérence ... bien que le développement (retardataire) du lanceur est largement sous contrôle de l'armée .... depuis 20 ans.
Quelle est la demande sous-jacente ? Plus de crédits pour les bureaux d'études ? Une nouvelle datcha pour les généraux ?
PS : la nausée ... c'est à cause du contenu de l'article ou parce que la traduction n'est pas bonne ?
- Spoiler:
Military criticized manned spaceship project
The Russian Defense Ministry RDR criticised the project of creation of a new manned spacecraft to fly to the Moon, developed rocket-Space Corporation Energia. According to the head of the Defense Ministry's military mission of Andrei Pronkeviča, who leads the newspaper Izvestia, development apparatus is not integrated. The announcement was made in the scientific and technical Council, which made the protection of the technical project of the ship.
In practice, the development of manned systems and complexes in Russia is carried out with the participation of military missions. They
are responsible for monitoring compliance of the basic characteristics of perspective samples of technology tehzadaniâ requirements of the
customer. Roskosmos from such practices is not going to give up.
According to Pronkeviča, the "energy" was needed to protect parts of a prospective managed the space shuttle rather than the whole complex as a whole, as it is now. Specification on the ship and its main component parts not approved. "The main executor was supposed to develop a list of technical tasks and approve it at the customer. To date, the work is not finished, said a spokesman for the Defense Ministry.
President of RSC Energia, Vitaly Lopota said the design of the vessel is currently without ready rocket. "It is absurd, in which we live today. We were told that will launch "Amur", which should be after "Hangars", while the "Angara" is not a very effective launch and it has yet to fly,
"said Lopota. Earlier, Director General of the Khrunichev Center named Alexander Seliverstov said of the new missile project has not yet started.
Under current plans, the first test flight of the new spacecraft should take place in the year 2018, and the first manned flight of the year 2020-. This schedule provides for a slight slippage. Not to be outdone by the graphics, in the year 2013 to begin development of working documentation for the elements of the future system. This documentation will be issued first experienced, and then copies of flight vehicle.
In early February, it became known that the RSC Energia has presented technical and economic parameters to create a spacecraft. Its value is estimated at 160 billion rubles. According to the Deputy Director of "Energy" Alexander Derečina, the new ship will be commensurate with the project "Energia-Buran" and eventually will replace the Soyuz vehicles, flying to the international space station.
Directly to the vessel would need around 100 billion rubles. Its value has increased almost twice, once it was decided to use the ship and fly to the moon. Some 40 billion rubles required to create rocket emergency recovery unit, Assembly-protective block and complex ground vehicles. 14.4 billion rubles will be spent on the preparation and launch of a spacecraft.
Et l'article 2 toujours par Bing (il dit à peu près la même chose)
- Spoiler:
The Defense Ministry rejected the draft of a spacecraft to fly to the Moon
Military experts have given the low assessment of works of RSC Energia to build a new spaceshipThe Defense Ministry rejected the draft of a spacecraft to fly to the Moon
Representatives of the Defense Ministry criticized enterprises Roskosmos to build a new manned system that planned an expedition to the moon. In the opinion of military representatives at the RSC Energia to develop a system is not comprehensive, as announced at the scientific and technical Council (STC) for the protection of the technical project promising manned transport system.
—
Before you can start protecting technical project manned space complex (PAC) to protect their parts, but to date the HMRC deals only with technical project on complex manned transport craft, — stressed in his report to the head of the military mission of NTMS of Defense of the Russian Federation Andrey Pronkevich. Is currently no approved specification to the PAC and its main parts. Principal executor was supposed to develop a list of technical tasks and approve it at the customer. To date, the work is not finished.
All prospective manned systems and complexes in Russia is carried out with the direct involvement of military missions, the main task of which is to monitor compliance with the main characteristics of the samples under the requirements of the customer tehzadaniâ. The Roskosmose say that not going to refuse to cooperate with voenpredstvami in this matter.
Pronkevich noted that the protection and acceptance of the technical project on PAC should generally be conducted after defending their parts.
In response, President of RSC Energia, Vitaly Lopota, called the situation absurd.
-We do not ship with missiles. It is absurd, in which we live today. We were told that will launch "Amur", which should be after "Hangars",
while the "Angara" is not a very effective launch and it's still not flying, "he said.11 February, in an interview with Izvestia "Khrunichev Centre Director Alexander Seliverstov said that rockets for manned space complex has not yet started.
— As a base for the PKK rocket would be regarded as "the hangar". Study on the subject in the center of the Space Center "is already there. As soon as we give the parameters of the PKK, we will form a relevant proposal to the media, said Seliverstov.
The RSC Energia plans to build a new manned spacecraft to its flight testing to begin in 2018, and the first manned flight is planned for the
year 2020. To keep pace with the schedule this year is due to start production of working documentation for the elements of the system. These documents will be experienced, and then copies of the flight of the spaceship.
Some slippage in terms of creating the ship and rocket designers provided.
—
Technical assignment allows testing of a new vessel in unmanned mode on the rocket «Zenith»,-said the Chief Designer of manned systems RSC Energia Nikolai Bryukhanov. And maintenance must be carried out on the Launcher, "Cupid." We have defined the technical requirements to the rocket "Amur", issued by the Organization, which this is.
In Roskosmose Izvestia reported that attached great importance to the work of military missions and be sure to take into account the opinion of experts.
—
Proceedings of the technical project on prospective piloted transport system (PCA) phase are being handed out for examination at the central scientific research institutions of the Russian Federal Space Agency and the Tsniimash, says Deputy Head of manned programs Roskosmos Volodymyr Mitin. — By results of examination is planned for the scientific and technical Council of Roscosmos, on which a final
decision will be made on further action: acceptance of the materials or the continuation of work to eliminate the deficiencies.
RSC Energia is developing a new manned space station from 2010 onwards. The layout of the habitable capsules was presented at Maks-2011. " In April 2012, the requirement to ship has been changed due to the emergence of Roscosmos plans expeditions to the Moon and to the project made substantial adjustments. Also in 2011, plans to have the media for the PKK. Development of special missiles "RUS" has been suspended in view of the substantial value of RF Sovbezom its creation (at least 202 billion roubles) and similarity design of draft decisions with those that apply in the "Hangar".
On retrouve l'argument des limites pour mettre au point une capsule tant que le lanceur dédié n'existe pas (Angara 3 ou 5 cores ? ou bien encore autre chose sous le vocable Amour ?) et que le complexe de tir doit aussi être conçu en conséquence (du vol habité).
Je n'ai pas trop compris ce que recouvrait le terme "Hangars" ?????We were told that will launch "Amur", which should be after "Hangars", while the "Angara" is not a very effective launch and it has yet to fly,
Ces remarques -pour ne pas dire récriminations- contre les incohérences ont-elles une certaine cohérence ... bien que le développement (retardataire) du lanceur est largement sous contrôle de l'armée .... depuis 20 ans.
Quelle est la demande sous-jacente ? Plus de crédits pour les bureaux d'études ? Une nouvelle datcha pour les généraux ?
PS : la nausée ... c'est à cause du contenu de l'article ou parce que la traduction n'est pas bonne ?
montmein69- Donateur
- Messages : 20962
Inscrit le : 01/10/2005
Age : 73
Localisation : région lyonnaise
Comme le reproduit montmein69 dans son post plus haut, la gabegie des communiqués "absurdes" continue et de temps en temps ressortent les vieux démons militaires qui s'en prennent à tout ce qui est vaisseaux habités vers la Lune, sauf peut-être par des tortues et autres lézards ! Les généraux russes voyaient "rouge" lorsqu'on leur parlait de la N1 en 1967, cela n'a pas changé en 2013. Bon, comme le souligne humoristiquement montmein69, qu'on leur construise des chateaux en Espagne et qu'il "foutent" la paix aux imaginatifs russes (s'il en reste) au sujet de l'activité spatiale de conquête.
Dans un post du 19 février dernier (rubrique Actualité USA) je rappelais que les militaires russes se lancaient dans la réalisation de deux gros ICBM, un à carburant liquide et un autre à carburant solide et que si ce programme était approuvé (?), les palabres sur un vaisseau lunaire seraient repoussés d'autant
Dans un post du 19 février dernier (rubrique Actualité USA) je rappelais que les militaires russes se lancaient dans la réalisation de deux gros ICBM, un à carburant liquide et un autre à carburant solide et que si ce programme était approuvé (?), les palabres sur un vaisseau lunaire seraient repoussés d'autant
Plaisanterie mise à part ... les militaires mettent en avant des objections techniques aux propositions de RSC Energia.
La définition initiale du PTS correspondait grosso-modo à trouver la relève de la capsule Soyouz. Et c'est sur cela qu'on avait planché depuis quelques années.
La volonté de définir un nouveau champ de missions (la Lune, donc des retours avec des vitesses cosmiques plus grandes) serait venu se surajouter plus récemment. Or selon eux .... cela a des implications sérieuses sur le design du vaisseau.Donc il faut prendre le temps d'étudier cela en détail, et ne pas se précipiter pour approuver trop rapidement les spécifications proposées par le constructeur..
Ils mettent aussi en question le doublement du prix du vaisseau depuis qu'on veut lui assigner des "missions Lune".
Bref .... AMHA il n'y a pas que de la caricature dans ces objections. (nonobstant que les aficionados ... voudraient bien un peu de Lune à se mettre sous la dent )
Pour décanter cela il serait urgent AMHA que la Russie décide d'un plan cohérent pour le spatial après 2020 et l'annonce.
On continue l'ISS ou pas ? On construit une nouvelle station purement russe en LEO (pour quoi y faire ?) ? On envisage un projet de station en coopération internationale en L2 Terre-Lune (pour quoi y faire ?) ? Bref on se fixe des objectifs et ensuite on construit un vaisseau spatial et un lanceur adapté à ces projets.
La définition initiale du PTS correspondait grosso-modo à trouver la relève de la capsule Soyouz. Et c'est sur cela qu'on avait planché depuis quelques années.
La volonté de définir un nouveau champ de missions (la Lune, donc des retours avec des vitesses cosmiques plus grandes) serait venu se surajouter plus récemment. Or selon eux .... cela a des implications sérieuses sur le design du vaisseau.Donc il faut prendre le temps d'étudier cela en détail, et ne pas se précipiter pour approuver trop rapidement les spécifications proposées par le constructeur..
Ils mettent aussi en question le doublement du prix du vaisseau depuis qu'on veut lui assigner des "missions Lune".
Bref .... AMHA il n'y a pas que de la caricature dans ces objections. (nonobstant que les aficionados ... voudraient bien un peu de Lune à se mettre sous la dent )
Pour décanter cela il serait urgent AMHA que la Russie décide d'un plan cohérent pour le spatial après 2020 et l'annonce.
On continue l'ISS ou pas ? On construit une nouvelle station purement russe en LEO (pour quoi y faire ?) ? On envisage un projet de station en coopération internationale en L2 Terre-Lune (pour quoi y faire ?) ? Bref on se fixe des objectifs et ensuite on construit un vaisseau spatial et un lanceur adapté à ces projets.
montmein69- Donateur
- Messages : 20962
Inscrit le : 01/10/2005
Age : 73
Localisation : région lyonnaise
pour votre gouverne personnelle le terme "Hangars" correspond...mais oui bien sûr à l'(h)Angar(a) ! C'est juste un problème d etraduction automatique du nom de la fusée. :megalol:
Bon les militaires ont juste peur qu'on leur prenne l'argent de leur avions et autres armes...
Bon les militaires ont juste peur qu'on leur prenne l'argent de leur avions et autres armes...
Moi qui ne fait que gouverner à vue avec ces traductions (c'est pourquoi je préfére la traduction russe ---> anglais) j'ai lu dans l'article 2 : Wepatchfree a écrit:pour votre gouverne personnelle le terme "Hangars" correspond...mais oui bien sûr à l'(h)Angar(a) ! C'est juste un problème d etraduction automatique du nom de la fusée.
.
We were told that will launch "Amur", which should be after "Hangars", while the "Angara" is not a very effective launch and it's still not flying
Et il y a les deux termes à 3 mots d'écarts .... ce qui laisse dubitatif sur une traduction défaillante d'autant qu'on semble vouloir expliquer "on lancerait Amour, qui viendrait après "Hangars" , alors que l'"Angara" n'a pas encore volé"
Bref .... comprenne qui pourra. A moins que Hangars soit utilisé pour les versions lourdes (3 ou 5 cores ?) alors que l'Angara désignerait la version légère Angara-one_core dont on attend le vol inaugural cette année :?: :?: :?:
montmein69- Donateur
- Messages : 20962
Inscrit le : 01/10/2005
Age : 73
Localisation : région lyonnaise
Moi qui ne fait qu'utiliser le traducteur automatique à longueur de post je peux te dire cher Montmein que Hangars est bien la traduction de Angara. Je l'ai vu cent fois. Alors pourquoi cette fois-ci et pas deux mots avant? Mystère des bits... et sans jeux de mots.
A l'occasion de la visite du gouverneur intérimaire de la Région d eMoscou à Energia on peut voir la maquette du PTS dans les ateliers:
Et aussi 2 autres photos montrant le concept des nouveaux sièges pour le PTS ainsi que des réservoirs en fibre pour le système d'atterrissage.
http://www.energia.ru/ru/news/news-2013/news_03-18.html
Et aussi 2 autres photos montrant le concept des nouveaux sièges pour le PTS ainsi que des réservoirs en fibre pour le système d'atterrissage.
http://www.energia.ru/ru/news/news-2013/news_03-18.html
patchfree a écrit:Et aussi 2 autres photos montrant le concept des nouveaux sièges pour le PTS
Si c'est à cette photo que tu fais référence, ce n'est pas quelque chose de nouveau. C'est une couchette Kazbek-U pour les Soyouz de première génération qui est exposée dans le musée d'Energuia...
J'avais eu l'occasion de le tester :)
_________________
Kosmonavtika - Le site de l'Espace russe
Le design du PTS est actuellement en phase d'examen, examen qui devrait prendre quelques mois, puis viendra lune nouvelle phase, celle du design technique détaillé et de la construction du premier prototype fonctionnel, a indiqué V Lopota.
http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/news/7142/
3/29/2013 technical expertise of the new ship will complete the project in a few months
Technical assessment of the project of the Russian manned transport spacecraft new generation will be completed within the next few months, told journalists on Friday the president - general designer RSC "Energia" (company-developer of the new ship) Vitaly Lopota.
"We have completed the technical design phase of manned transport spacecraft of new generation. Currently performing stage examination", - said Lopota.
"Within a few months, will be completed examination and the project will enter into the next stage - the detailed design and construction of the first prototype (new ship)," - he added.
Earlier, the head of Roscosmos, Vladimir Popovkin, said that the new Russian manned spacecraft, which can carry out long flights and to go to the Moon, will be created by 2018, but then it will start unmanned test. The new ship, which in the future could replace "union", will be able not only to fly to the ISS, and to the moon.
Provides for the establishment of several modifications of the ship, intended to be operated at the Earth and lunar orbit, repairing satellites, as well as information from the orbit of the failed satellites and large debris. Manned spacecraft will be a new generation of land ten times more accurate than the "Union" through the use of a parachute-landing rocket system, RIA Novosti reported.
http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/news/7142/
Une interview de Lopota concernant le PTS. Il confirme quelques points: module de rentrée réutilisable, 4 passagers, avec possibilité de ramener 6 passagers depuis l'ISS.
http://www.militarynews.ru/excl.asp?ex=165
- Spoiler:
- President of RSC "Energia" Vitaly Lopota:
- At what stage is the design of advanced transport ship the next generation?
- Currently, RSC "Energia" and related organizations to complete the first phase of production of materials engineering design prospective manned transportation system, part of which is a promising next-generation transport ship. Made the transfer of materials to the examination of the project to the customer.
- When the technical design of the new ship will be adopted by the Russian Space Agency?
- Technical design perspective manned transport system of the first stage will be adopted in the coming months Roscosmos after the examination.
- We know that in the final stage of implementation of the technical project was substantially changed the original specification and many doubted that in these conditions the RSC "Energia" will be able to accomplish?
- In April 2012 the Russian Space Agency was approved addition to the original terms of reference for engineering design prospective manned transportation system without changing the total amount of the contract.
The main objective of prospective manned transportation system was to provide flights to the moon with the possibility of transport and maintenance of near-Earth space stations.
In this regard, the project of the ship following changes: increased fuel to ensure the return of the moon, refined heat shield for re-entry to the Earth's escape velocity, changes in board radio for vehicle communication with Earth from the moon, increased duration free flight, which required revision support systems. Underweight at the changes required to carry out work to facilitate and optimize all elements of design and onboard systems.
As a result of a considerable increase in running pilot konstuktorskih and technological work on the project. In this difficult environment, our team was able to mobilize and carry out all the work in full. Take this opportunity to thank the staff of RSC "Energia" and our cooperation for understanding and selfless work.
- So, after changes in the new ship will be able to travel to the Moon, Mars, asteroids?
- After adjusting the terms of reference the main objective prospective manned transportation system was to provide the first phase of flight to the moon. Part of prospective spacecraft in Martian expeditions and missions to asteroids may be to maintain interplanetary complexes.
- Much Does the new requirements Roscosmos impeded the development of a new ship?
- Delivery of the technical project was moved by the customer for just six months - from December 2012 to June 2013
- What is the essential difference between the new draft of the ship from the same "Union"?
- The main differences from the "Union": reusable reentry vehicle, which is provided as a result of the replacement thermal protection and planting technologies, increasing the size of the crew to four people with the ability to return to Earth the space station to six people by reducing the weight of the payload, the ability to deliver to the space station up to 500 kg of cargo in addition to the crew of the cargo and return to Earth. In addition, the new ship will be implemented enhanced precision landing, used on-board systems based on modern digital equipment, enhanced capabilities in terms of board radio communication via relay satellites, established a two-stage missile emergency rescue unit, ensuring the recovery vehicle to rescue the crew of the entire section excretion.
- When is the launch of the spacecraft in manned and unmanned versions?
- Subject to launch long-term stable funding for unmanned spacecraft could take place in 2018, and in manned - unmanned after the loop test of not less than three flights.
- Do I have to use to run the Baikonur East or perhaps testing the ship and for its subsequent launches, from Baikonur?
- In accordance with the amendment to the technical task, in order to accelerate the release promising manned transport system on flight phase was required to explore the possibility of prospective conduct test launches spacecraft from the Baikonur Cosmodrome, however, are permitted space rocket "Zenit-M".
- Whether to start work on the creation of individual components, systems and casing management systems ship in "hardware"?
- As part of the technical design working models were made a number of devices and components onboard systems, including the central computer modules, blocks display (display) panel of astronauts, fiber-optic gyroscope, telemetry devices, parachute system, control equipment and control power supply system; chair astronauts and more.
Were made and tested in wind tunnels 17 models of the recovery vehicle and discharge head unit, conducted 250 tests of samples of thermal protection materials, etc.
- When can you start funding the production of the ship?
- Documentation required to determine the timing and amount of financing was provided at the beginning of February 2013 as part of the technical design. Funding for the creation and production of prospective ship determined Roscosmos after considering the submissions. We expect that in 2014.
- About what amount can we talk?
- Estimating the cost of further work to develop advanced ship in the technical proposal, including the production of products and layout of regular ship. According to preliminary calculations, the cost of production without the cost of manufacturing staff can ship up to 50% of the cost of the entire project.
http://www.militarynews.ru/excl.asp?ex=165
Dernière édition par patchfree le Mar 2 Avr 2013 - 23:54, édité 1 fois
Page 12 sur 29 • 1 ... 7 ... 11, 12, 13 ... 20 ... 29
Sujets similaires
» nouveau vaisseau russe: développé en coopération avec l'ESA
» Le nouveau vaisseau Russe et sa fusée présentés fin mars 2009
» Orlyonok, version légère du vaisseau spatial Oriol
» Le furtur vaisseau russe
» Oduvanchik, vaisseau russe ?
» Le nouveau vaisseau Russe et sa fusée présentés fin mars 2009
» Orlyonok, version légère du vaisseau spatial Oriol
» Le furtur vaisseau russe
» Oduvanchik, vaisseau russe ?
Page 12 sur 29
Permission de ce forum:
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum